Tuesday 5 November 2013

Manna in the wilderness (Exodus 16) - Part 4

Part 4 concludes the series on "Manna in the wilderness (Exodus 16)". 

PART 4: Manna, Community and the Eucharist (Lord's Supper/Communion)

From the study in PART 1, we see that manna affirmed Israel’s calling and identity. Its provision affirmed Israel as a people whom God had redeemed as His own and whose needs He would provide as a Father. Like the journeys of the patriarchs and later exiles, Israel’s journey through the wilderness was a way by which God renewed the people’s awareness of His election and confirmed their faith as a nation. Furthermore, manna not only nourished individuals but also cultivated concern for the nourishment of one’s neighbours in the context of food sharing. Israel’s wilderness was a journey by which the social nature and moral responsibility of God’s people unfolded.

Christ commanded that we should eat bread and drink the cup (Lk 22:14-20, 1 Cor 11:23-26) in eucharistic worship, by which we become one Body. Manna brings us to consider bread in the liturgy of the Church as the often-overlooked means of forming the Body of Christ.

First, the impressions of God’s faithfulness to His people found in manna were deepened in Christ’s Last Supper. The message of manna echoed by the Jewish Passover commemorated God’s deliverance of Israel from Egyptian captivity. The Last Supper, on the other hand, is to be eaten in eucharistic worship not only to commemorate. It also actualises the past events of Christ’s deliverance of His people from sin’s captivity so that the power of Christ’s death and resurrection may be availed in the present while the Church looks forward to the future eschaton.[1] If manna was to form Israel into a son who fears and obeys God, trusts in His deliverance during troubled times and is confident of its privileges of sonship, even more so should the Eucharist for the Church. 

Secondly, the manna-mediated communion between God and Israel is far more intimate in the Eucharist. The Eucharist affords not only communion but ultimately, a union between Christ and the Church. If Israel matured by God’s companionship evidenced by manna, even more so should the Church mature by the sensual enactment of the final consummation of this divine-human union (cf. Rev 19:5-10). 

Finally, manna unified and reconfigured the communal identity of Israel which was rooted in sharing God’s divine nourishment. Surely then, the Eucharist is important because it shapes a community which finds its orientation in sharing the nourishment of bread and wine. Consequently, the unified Church may share effectively in the priesthood of Christ from which different ministries flow and thus, manifest the invisible High Priest Himself to the world.[2]     

     [1] See Chan, Liturgical Theology, p.79.

     [2] Supported by Crichton, “A Theology of Worship”, p.23.

BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Chan, Simon. Liturgical Theology: The Church as Worshiping Community. Downers Grove,
Illinois: InterVarsity Press, 2006.

Crichton, J. D. “A Theology of Worship” in A Study of Liturgy, rev. ed., ed. Cheslyn Jones et al. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1992.  

No comments: